Columbia’s Protests: Free Speech Under Fire

Published by

on

Julia Kane ‘27

Opinions Editor

Columbia University is a prestigious Ivy League University in the heart of New York City, producing alumni with the likes of Barack Obama, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, to name just a few. However, Columbia has been a recent topic of the news for its presence of pro-Palestinian protests on their campus. In particular, Mahmoud Khalil has become a symbol of how free speech in America is being threatened under the new Trump administration. 

A Palestinian refugee born in Syria, Khalil is a Columbia graduate student who mediated negotiations between Columbia’s administration and protestors on the campus. Khalil holds a green card granting him permanent residency in the U.S., while his pregnant wife, Noor Abdalla, is a US citizen, born and raised in Michigan. Due to his leading presence in Columbia’s protests and his identifiability without a mask, Khalil was taken by ICE officials and detained indefinitely. Even though he has a Green Card, Khalil may be deported under the statute used against non-citizens who have caused  “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.” This is a unique situation, as authorities are acknowledging that Khalil is not guilty of committing a crime, which is the typical reasoning behind deporting noncitizens. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has stated that Khalil has promoted antisemitic, pro-Hamas activities at Columbia. Columbia was also under threat of losing $400 million in funding due to their “antisemitic protests,” giving the school no choice but to comply with the Trump administration’s demands. Columbia has given in, agreeing to ban students from wearing masks at protests and will hire 36 new campus security officers who can arrest student protestors, among other demands. I believe a crucial misconception has caused the unlawful detention of Khalil and plunges the U.S into a frightening state where freedom of speech may not be a guaranteed Constitutional right.

In the protests themselves, students held Palestinian flags and signs that had phrases such as “Cease Genocide,” “Columbia Alumni Support Gaza and the Encampment,” and other calls for action and divestment. There are very few, if any, signs or symbols of antisemitism in these protests and are not inherently against Jewish students. Columbia’s students should be able to show their support for Palestine and the over 50,000 people who have lost their lives since October 7, 2023. To me, there is an important distinction between supporting Palestine’s civilians and being critical of Prime Minister Netanyahu and Israeli officials versus being a Hamas supporter and antisemitic. I adamantly oppose the actions of Netanyahu and the genocide of Palestinian citizens, but that is not equal to saying I am against Jewish individuals or am a Hamas supporter, as they are in the wrong as well. Mahmoud Khalil should not have been taken from his apartment under the pretense that he is an antisemitic Hamas fanatic, simply because he was a strong supporter of Palestine and students’ right to protest. 

Additionally, to me, it seems fraudulent that President Trump is trying so desperately to appear as a staunch opponent to antisemitism to have grounds to deport people like Khalil for protesting. Many Jewish individuals feel as though their identities are being used to wrongfully deport Khalil, as the New Jewish Narrative group wrote a letter to Secretary Noem stating, “​​A coalition of American Jewish organizations sent a letter to the Trump administration today expressing deep concern about his exploitation of antisemitism…we are especially deeply disturbed to the circumstances surround the apprehension and deportation of Mahmoud Khalil. Arresting and/or deporting people because of their political views goes against the very foundation of our national identity and is profoundly un-American.”

No matter who you support in the Israel-Palestine conflict, the condemnation of Columbia’s student-led protests and detainment of Mahmoud Khalil should sound the alarm that the first amendment is not always guaranteed. We cannot allow freedom of speech and protest to be twisted into a tool that can punish those who criticize the government, as this is profoundly undemocratic and un-American. If America wants to continue priding itself on being the land of the free, students must be allowed to peacefully protest and fight for what they believe in, regardless of its alignment with the President’s agenda. 

Featured image courtesy of USA Today Network

Copy Edited by Ben Lepper ’25

9 responses to “Columbia’s Protests: Free Speech Under Fire”

  1.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Amen!

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    He’s not a U.S. citizen though, he has a green card and has been connected with groups that actively call for the death and destruction of the west and western citizens and has been arguing in favor of Hamas and October 7th. If the Trump administration were deporting American citizens in support of Hamas that would be one thing. But they are deporting green card holders, who have no legal right to be here. No one has a right to come to America and spew terroristic propaganda

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      he was a permanent resident, and the only group he we are aware of him being apart of is the UNRWA, where he was an unpaid intern — The kind of cherry-picking rhetoric you’re using to justify his abduction is part of the problem. Even if he was spreading “terroristic propaganda”, dissent should be considered the highest form of patriotism, especially in a country founded off of what the British would have considered terroristic propaganda themselves.

      1.  Avatar
        Anonymous

        I would hardly call calling for the death of every westerner and siding with people who call for the death of every non Shia Muslim a form of “dissent.” The Nazis called for the death of all the Jews, that’s not dissent, that’s just evil. He was not a permanent resident, he was here on a green card and spent his time here being a professional agitator and was associated with numerous groups that had ties to terrorist entities. It would be cherry picking if you took one sentiment out of context. It’s not cherry picking if the guy’s entire time spent here was spent arguing in favor of terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.

        1.  Avatar
          Anonymous

          Exactly what groups did he associate with that were affiliated with terroristic activities?

          1.  Avatar
            Anonymous

            For one? The UNRWA which has been honeycombed with actual Hamas terrorists. But he has been connected with numerous groups and made plenty of statements that are not just anti – Israel (which is perfectly within his rights of free speech) but are actively siding with terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah and have made dozens of posts calling for the death of all westerners

        2.  Avatar
          Anonymous

          Shamefully ironic how you use the parallel of the nazis to condemn Mahmoud, while both the government he is criticizing and the government he is being detained by are close to nazis than he ever was. Also he nor columbia SJP never said or endorsed any of those things. Your brain is genuinely clogged by propaganda.

          Also like it or not, dissent sometimes is cruel. I would remind you that famously, the patriots poured scathing tar on british civilian loyalists and covered them in feathers. However just like with the patriots that came before, what seems cruel or insane to you can have a justifiable reason. I encourage you to suspend your disbelief and do some research into why hamas was founded, for instance (and which side funded them. hint hint: we consider them “our greatest ally”), and therefore why some may have some critical support for them.

          1.  Avatar
            Anonymous

            The only Jewish state that has minority in its democratic government are the Nazis? Not the people who call for the death of every Jew in Israel. Hamas was absolutely not founded because of Israel. They formed because they wanted to conquer Israel and kill all the Jews. That is a historical fact. They called for freeing “Palestine” long before Israel was ever near the Gaza Strip. You know the difference between the American Revolution and Hamas? Those in favor of the American Revolution didn’t burn babies in ovens and rape women and kidnap Holocaust survivors. I don’t care who you are burning a baby alive in an oven is never justified. Also Hamas regularly commits war crimes by using civilians as shields and operating in civilian centers. When was the last time Hamas had an election? Israel is a democracy with minority rights. Hamas is the modern day Nazis. And somehow there is a question between who is morally superior?

            1.  Avatar
              Anonymous

              So the baby burning thing is just a lie. Also there’s only one side which practices systemic rape, and hint: it’s not Hamas. I’d say to look at the UN reports about Israeli mass rape but I already know the caliber of human you are, so you’ll just call the UN Hamas, every source I bring up Hamas, and maybe also that I’m Hamas. Also, it’s a “historical fact” that Israel funded Hamas to undermine the PLO and its founder and co founder only created the group after witnessing their respective homes being ethnically cleansed (the co founded watching his uncle being lined up and shot). Also, I’m Jewish. I know damn well what Nazis look like, and the Nazis were not trapped in an open air prison which spawned their violence, they wanted land and total dominion because their ideology is founded on the colonial project. That only describes Israel.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Spire

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading