The Lie of a Moral Economic System

Published by

on

Tucker Scott ‘26

Guest Writer

Voters from both parties today have soured on capitalism. Young people especially are more in favor of socialism, despite the fact that they don’t know what socialism is. This is due to a fundamental lie that both the left and right have been telling the voters of this country for decades, that capitalism, free markets, and laissez-faire economics will solve all of your problems. The truth is that it won’t. Capitalism can’t solve the problems America faces, just like corporatism, socialism, and communism can’t solve them either. Because that’s not the job of an economic system.

Capitalism isn’t moral, but that’s the point. An economic system is not meant to be moral, it is meant to create the best benefit for the consumer. Morality is meant to come from the social fabric– from religion, culture, and society. Capitalism is “failing,” as so many people claim, because of a fundamental misunderstanding of what capitalism does. People misunderstand capitalism as it is meant to promote morality instead of its actual job, which is meant to benefit the consumer. Capitalism creates more pie, whereas socialism can only divide up the pie that exists. 

This misunderstanding is what leads so many young people to look favorable towards socialism, because the lie of socialism and communism is that it can create a moral economic system. One based on fairness and equality. But the truth is, it can’t. No economic system can fix moral problems, and the more an economic system tries to fix moral problems, the worse it gets for everyone. No economic system, no matter how amazing, can solve moral problems. 

Now is capitalism the best economic system to generate prosperity? No doubt. Thanks to capitalism more than half the world has been lifted out of poverty and into prosperity. Thanks to capitalism we have all the amazing things like technology, medicine, planes, and so much more that were not even dreams yet thirty years ago. If the founders were transported to today, they would legitimately believe they had died and gone to heaven. But despite all the good that capitalism has created, it can’t fix societal ills. And it shouldn’t have to, because that isn’t the job of an economic system. It would be comparable to asking a plumber to build a rocket ship. Both jobs are incredibly important, but they have nothing to do with one another. So is capitalism good? Absolutely. But is it moral? No, and it shouldn’t have to be. To be fair, socialism and communism aren’t moral either but for completely different reasons. They aren’t moral because they are based on the government infringing on individual rights and freedoms rather than allowing the people the right to choose. If you want moral clarity and advice go to a church. But if you want the best and newest advancements at the lowest prices, then go to capitalism.

What makes capitalism so successful is that it is a recognition of two basic facts. First, people are inherently selfish and greedy, and second that no one person could know more than the market as a whole. First the recognition that people are inherently selfish and greedy. This is where socialism and communism go wrong. They believe that inherently people are good and that it is the evil capitalist society that has corrupted them to be greedy. But that’s just not true. When it comes down to it, people are selfish and only motivated by a desire for wealth, power, and prosperity. But what capitalism does is that it turns that desire for wealth, power, and prosperity into something that can help everyone. People develop new and better ideas and products to make money, but those new and better ideas and products still help everyone who’s buying them. Second is the idea that no one person could know more than the market as a whole. This is just a basic fact and one that socialism and communism fail to recognize. No one head of a government department or even group of officials could possibly have the knowledge or wisdom that the society as a whole has. This is where capitalism succeeds, because it corrals all the wisdom and knowledge that the society has to ensure that everyone has the best and most efficient product.

Now none of this is to say that I believe capitalism is perfect. It isn’t. Just like anything else created by humans it is mired in sin, open to exploitation, and ultimately flawed. However when compared to any other system capitalism so far exceeds it would be foolish to get rid of it. As the great thinker and leader Winston Churchill once said, “Capitalism is the worst system, except for all the others.” And, like with most things, he was right. It would be foolish to give up on a system that has generated so much prosperity for so many people world wide because of a belief that an economic system could, or even should, be moral.

Featured Image Courtesy of Peace Innovation Institute

Copy edited by Colette Potter

4 responses to “The Lie of a Moral Economic System”

  1.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Your spot on.

    ive been an academic and ive been a construction contractor. The worst clients I ever have would have been hard left.

    If we lived in the parallel universe the fools on the left dream of, the most horrible people would find positions of power just like they have in every other alternative to capitalism in history.

    Absolutely anyone who says differently is either a fool or one of the creeps we need to keep from gaining power over people.

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      “would have been” so like, you’re assuming? Or did you see a pride flag on their desk and assume they just *must* be power hungry communists 😭

      Seriously, Ignoring that your entire point is a faulty generalization, for an ‘academic’, it’s ringing alarm bells to seemingly not know or just be willfully ignoring that one of the fundamental principles of the ‘hard left’ is the withering away of the state since, assuming you accept the argument that the state exists to enforce class antagonisms, no class antagonisms, being the goal of a “leftist parallel universe”, would lead to the need for the state to disappear. Like c’mon, this is telling me you’ve never read leftist literature without telling me you’ve never read leftist literature. This is literally 101. What a completely unserious thing to comment, which makes sense, considering how unserious this article is. It’s just as disrespectful as the leftists you say you interacted with to not do fair, academic diligence, that is fairly presented and justified, and instead affirm PragerU-tier hitpiece garbage like its gospel.

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    The entire premise of this piece is so ridiculous that I almost did not respond. Almost. However the notion that it is fine for an economic system to be based on fundamentally immoral behavior is preposterous. Morality governs the entirety of ones actions, so if you want the members of your country to be moral then set up a moral mode of production. I would have respected this piece more if you just said morality be gone, let us all be terrible. Instead you argue that we should still be moral just not at our jobs. You are completely dismissive of all other economic structures with absolutely zero justification. The idea that capitalism promotes the best outcome for the consumer shows just how little you know about economics at all. I have never read such unabashed bootlicking before, this is inanity.

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      THANK you SO MUCH for saying this, but there’s a bit more i’d like to add. the argument relies on the idea that “morality comes from religion and culture not economy” but religious morality and culture comes from the economy😭 (for proof of this look no further than the biblical hatred of usury and the “eye of a needle” hyperbole, and the fact that western nations are individualistic whereas socialist/post-socialist ones are collectivistic). So, yeah, what the above said is right. If you want a moral people, the fundamental root of this is a moral economy. the funny thing is is that socialists address this through the base and superstructure hypothesis, which goes to show its not socialists that don’t know what socialism is, it’s literally just the author. there’s also the fundamental baked-in idea here that socialism doesn’t work where capitalism does because of the economic calculation problem, and
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646771/, https://www.wfp.org/news/world-wealth-9-million-people-die-every-year-hunger-wfp-chief-tells-food-system-summit that just is not true. the idea that humans are greedy so capitalism fits human nature, which is just wrong (mirror neurons, the fact that we are inherently a group species), and the idea that socialism can’t invent which is also just wrong (project cybersyn, Altai mobile telephone system, entire space/arms race). I’m assuming the author hates socialism because of famines or something, which totally didn’t happen under churchill, but the author doesn’t seem to care about that. This article is more focused on hitting PragerU talking points than being serious.

Leave a Reply to AnonymousCancel reply

Discover more from The Spire

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading